Re-name Paddock?

Follow This Carefully:

When you guys talk about “certain individuals” or “various people” being narrow-minded or trying to control what’s said on the forum and deleting posts, etc. – you are really talking about Tim and I. It’s offensive and it’s pissed me off for the last time. We are the moderators. It’s not an easy job trying to keep all of you Type-A’s from ripping each other apart on a daily basis. Tim’s job is actually harder than mine. He puts himself out there at my direction and then gets ripped for it. Shame on you. He and I talk almost daily about threads and posts. We are trying to keep the peace and be fair, but you all seem hell bent on a fight. We are the only two that have deleted posts. So, your comments can only be directed at us. Furthermore, Tim only deletes posts after talking to me first. So, ultimately you beef is with me. You can leave the “certain individuals” comments at the door. I’ve got this one, and will be speaking on this issue from now on.

Tim’s comments regarding The Paddock are 100% valid. This is a car club. Not a PAC, or a bible study group, an NRA meeting, or a classroom. He (and others) would like to see The Paddock deleted. But, it’s not because he wants to limit any one’s speech – that ridiculous. His thought is that if this forum was limited to discussions about cars, cruising, the club, shows, etc. – we wouldn’t be fighting with each other on a daily basis. That’s it – just his way of attaining a level of “peace” – delete the problem. I disagree. I think that we can have The Paddock, and it can be moderated to maintain peace. And to that end, at my direction he has taken on the responsibility of that moderation. And now, you guys want to give him crap about it. NO MORE. It’s me. It’s always been me.

You guys wanted The Paddock - That's why we have it.

Personally, I could do without The Paddock. I feel like I have information overload sometimes when it comes to the political stuff. I have my viewpoints and doubt anything that is said in The Paddock will change my mind. I think The Paddock is becoming an embarrassment and an albatross. I wouldn’t miss it if it were gone. If enough of you feel the same way, we’ll shut the door on The Paddock - again, not to shut down free speech – but to keep the peace. There are plenty of other places on the internet to vent.

We have lost members, and alienated others because of the goings on in The Paddock. That has been our concern from the very beginning. And now this pot is about to boil over - AGAIN. We assumed that because you wanted The Paddock, and because you’re all successful well-adjusted adults – that you can handle the responsibility of treating each other in a friendly and respectful way. That turns out to be a mistake. On the few occasions that we have had to delete some posts or threads it was to save any of you from embarrassment or ridicule, and in general keep the peace. But, you seem hell bent on pushing back.

So, as Dean has said deleting posts should be used very rarely. I like his assessment, and we will no longer delete posts. This should make most everyone happy. But, I still need a moderation tool at my disposal. You see, keeping the peace and maintaining a level of adult behavior is still a must. So, here’s what I’ll do. When a thread gets out of hand, I’ll attempt to bring it back on topic. If that fails, I’ll close it. When a member goes off the deep-end, I’ll warn them, then ban them for a period or permanently if they persist. So, carry on in The Paddock. Anything goes – everything does not. When you cross the line, we’ll let you know – publicly and harshly.

Tim and I have been nice, too nice, and you keep biting back. We’re tired of babysitting. It’s going to stop, or you’ll be shown the door. Tim has been a tremendous help to this club from the beginning. Today, he is driving 100s of miles with his trailer to bring home Chuck’s car when he could be driving his own car. And next week, he’ll be helping Chuck out again – 100s of miles with a trailer. And if you asked him to do it the week after that – he would. He and I care so much about this club, and devote so much time to this club, and care about everyone in this club. We have been trying to keep the peace - that all.

Now, I realize that some of you may disagree with my comments or strategy. That’s fine and I want to make sure you have a remedy in accordance with the democracy that is this club. So, if you wish - call for an election, forward a second, put up a slate of candidates and we’ll hold a vote – happily. We’re in our 3rd year here and maybe you feel we need a change. That’s more than fine with me.

Finally, if you’re in this club and want to remain in this club - we have two very simple rules. Respect and friendship. If those two things are too freakin difficult for you to understand or abide by on an on-going basis then you’re obviously some kind of anti-social ass wipe and you’ll be shown the door.

Enjoy the Spring. Drive (or build) your car.
 
Let me say 1st of all that I for one do NOT wish to see a change of leadership for the club. You & Tim have done an outstanding job of leading the club. You have both given tirelessly & sacrificially of your time, labor & love for the benefit of the club. You have been very kind, warmhearted & sincere Mark & have never treated me disrespectfully or as anything other than a friend. Tim has given of himself beyond what most would be willing to do. I had the most fun I've ever had a car related event @ Supercruise last year & Tim deserves all the credit for that & I can't thank him enough for that.

I intend to deal with this latest "controversy" that I have created (I will accept the blame for it) privately outside of this public forum by way of overatures to Mark & Tim. My goal is reconciliation & forgiveness. I pray that God will grant me the wisdom to see my fault (log in my own eye) in this matter & that I will not be quick to point out the splinter in anyone else's eye in my efforts to reconcile & seek forgiveness.
 
There are always exceptions but I firmly believe that you should say what you mean and mean what you say. In real life, face to face interactions you can't take it back. You can apologize but once it is said, well, its out there. The option to let people "take it back" isn't real world for me. If you say something, stand behind it. There is a real need for a moderator but the delete function should rarely be used. It becomes to easy to pretend something was never said.

I really don't want the paddock changed.

Dean has expressed my view very concisely.

The conversation in the Paddock should be no different than a face to face discussion.

And no one is even remotely suggesting a change in leadership. Just don't feel that the moderator's role is to take the place of good personal judgment.

But let a person express how they feel about a subject and not an edited version.

If a member wants to be an ass....let him do so publicly. There is no need to coddle or correct or attempt to avoid a personality clash. If the person is too aggressive, too direct, too confrontational or too lunatic fringe...let his words and actions be judged publicly by all the members. Not just the moderators. It's no different in life. I would rather perceive a person by his own comments and actions than an edited version of his feelings.

In my opinion being honest is more important than avoiding controversy.

Everyone is an adult here.... and life is full of opposing viewpoints, personal criticism and disappointments. Being an adult is learning to personally deal with these challenges in life. Not relying on a third party to deal with them for you.

Kerry
 
Dean has expressed my view very concisely.

The conversation in the Paddock should be no different than a face to face discussion.

And no one is even remotely suggesting a change in leadership. Just don't feel that the moderator's role is to take the place of good personal judgment.

But let a person express how they feel about a subject and not an edited version.

If a member wants to be an ass....let him do so publicly. There is no need to coddle or correct or attempt to avoid a personality clash. If the person is too aggressive, too direct, too confrontational or too lunatic fringe...let his words and actions be judged publicly by all the members. Not just the moderators. It's no different in life. I would rather perceive a person by his own comments and actions than an edited version of his feelings.

In my opinion being honest is more important than avoiding controversy.

Everyone is an adult here.... and life is full of opposing viewpoints, personal criticism and disappointments. Being an adult is learning to personally deal with these challenges in life. Not relying on a third party to deal with them for you.

Kerry

I AGREE 100% Kerry. Not sure what you mean by 3rd party. I think you were referring to moderators. Correct?

We should not run & hide from issues or concerns within the club. If someone has offended you then say so. I obviously offended Mark & for that he has my sincerest apology. I will always TRY to take the "high road" & seek out reconciliation with anyone I have offended. My remarks were not intended to offend, but obviously they did. I was trying to address issues & concerns regarding certain things that have been occurring within the forum & also at club events. If we sweep issues & concerns under the carpet & try to pretend they don't exist then they will fester & cause sores & wounds that at some point in time may not heal. Arabs & Jews have been feuding for over 5,000 years. There has to be forgiveness & without it there will never be reconciliation.
 
Dean has expressed my view very concisely.

The conversation in the Paddock should be no different than a face to face discussion.

And no one is even remotely suggesting a change in leadership. Just don't feel that the moderator's role is to take the place of good personal judgment.

But let a person express how they feel about a subject and not an edited version.

If a member wants to be an ass....let him do so publicly. There is no need to coddle or correct or attempt to avoid a personality clash. If the person is too aggressive, too direct, too confrontational or too lunatic fringe...let his words and actions be judged publicly by all the members. Not just the moderators. It's no different in life. I would rather perceive a person by his own comments and actions than an edited version of his feelings.

In my opinion being honest is more important than avoiding controversy.

Everyone is an adult here.... and life is full of opposing viewpoints, personal criticism and disappointments. Being an adult is learning to personally deal with these challenges in life. Not relying on a third party to deal with them for you.

Kerry

I AGREE 100% Kerry. Not sure what you mean by 3rd party. I think you were referring to moderators. Correct?

We should not run & hide from issues or concerns within the club. If someone has offended you then say so. I obviously offended Mark & for that he has my sincerest apology. I will always TRY to take the "high road" & seek out reconciliation with anyone I have offended. My remarks were not intended to offend, but obviously they did. I was trying to address issues & concerns regarding certain things that have been occurring within the forum & also at club events. If we sweep issues & concerns under the carpet & try to pretend they don't exist then they will fester & cause sores & wounds that at some point in time may not heal. Arabs & Jews have been feuding for over 5,000 years. There has to be forgiveness & without it there will never be reconciliation.

Perhaps it is now time to seriously consider ending/doing away with the paddock. It has evidently caused way too much stress for Mark, Tim & others within the club which they obviuosly do not deserve to have to put up with. If the majority so votes I am more then happy to end the Paddock.

Here's a thought. Shut down the Paddock for a 1 month trial period to see if it stops the ____ & leads to peace, harmony & less or no stress. :)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top