A Snake
Member #024
I'll tell ya what is wrong...when someone disagrees with me...nuff said.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'll tell ya what is wrong...when someone disagrees with me...nuff said.
I'll tell ya what is wrong...when someone disagrees with me...nuff said.
Here is part of the law and remember this a hole dumped 2 nice dogs
2005 Missouri Code - § 578.009. — Animal neglect and abandonment--penalties.
Share | 578.009. 1. A person is guilty of animal neglect when he has custody or ownership or both of an animal and fails to provide adequate care or adequate control, which results in substantial harm to the animal.
2. A person is guilty of abandonment when he has knowingly abandoned an animal in any place without making provisions for its adequate care.
3. Animal neglect and abandonment is a class C misdemeanor upon first conviction and for each offense, punishable by imprisonment or a fine not to exceed five hundred dollars, or both, and a class B misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment or a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars, or both upon the second and all subsequent convictions. All fines and penalties for a first conviction of animal neglect or abandonment may be waived by the court provided that the person found guilty of animal neglect or abandonment shows that adequate, permanent remedies for the neglect or abandonment have been made. Reasonable costs incurred for the care and maintenance of neglected or abandoned animals may not be waived. This section shall not apply to the provisions of section 578.007.
4. In addition to any other penalty imposed by this section, the court may order a person found guilty of animal neglect or abandonment to pay all reasonable costs and expenses necessary for:
(1) The care and maintenance of neglected or abandoned animals within the person's custody or ownership;
(2) The disposal of any dead or diseased animals within the person's custody or ownership;
(3) The reduction of resulting organic debris affecting the immediate area of the neglect or abandonment; and
(4) The avoidance or minimization of any public health risks created by the neglect or abandonment of the animals.
Punishable by imprisonment --- And I suspect this is what they are going for times 2.
Anyone who can willing abuse or intentionally cause harm to an animal is capable of doing the same toward a human. Animal abuse is especially egregious if that animal has learned to depend upon and trust that human for it's care.
The abuse of any creature exposes a predisposition toward cruelty that cannot be limited just... to animals.
Kerry
Kerry:
I substantially agree with you, however our accepted treatment of domesticated animals is vastly different from how we treat human beings. When one of our parents falls and breaks a leg we don't shoot them, nor do we take our grandparents to the doctor to be put down when they become too ill.
I have no problem with civil penalties (fines) for the abuse of animals. But I still draw the line at being deprived of my God given freedom if I should abuse an animal.
A thought just occurred to me - if I go to a bar, get drunk, get in my car and run over someone, killing them, I will be charged with manslaughter. If instead, I run over a dog and kill it, extrapolating some of the laws that have been posted here, I should receive a sentence equivalent to the one for running over a person. I'd be surprised if anyone here would agree with that.
God gave us dominion over the animals. That dominion carries with it the responsibility to treat those animals appropriately. But I don't believe it was meant to imply that animals are on the same level as humans. Imprisonment for crimes against animals does.
Steve
What they did to Michael Vick is outrageous. Now, I know what he did was wrong and he deserved to be punished. But his punishment far outweighs his crime. After serving his prison term and being paroled, he has to survive on a court ordered stipend of 4000 a month. His mother also gets a small stipend since he was supporting her. His legal bills, and other various debts totaling in the 10s of millions are to be paid via court order out of his NFL paychecks over the next 10 years. So, in reality he is forced by the court to be an NFL MVP quarterback, perform at the very top of the league, making top dollar (about 10 mill a year) for the next several years - basically the entirety of his career and turn all of that money over to his lawyers and debtors all while living on what we would consider poverty level wages. That's a heavy price to pay - and he'll pay it or violate his parole. Can you imagine - if he isn't in the playoffs, or making big plays, or signing big contracts - he'll go back to jail. He's basically a modern day slave.
What is often left out of these discussions is also the massive abuse of drugs and alcohol. Look at Leonard Little. 2 DWIs - and 2 people dead - and he still gets to play every Sunday.
Will still say the N F L should have never let him come back...
This is the same NFL that let's gun waving, bar fighting, knife weilding, wife beating, girl rapers, crack smoking, drug dealing, DWI killers play every Sunday in every major city in the country - and you're worried about a guy that harmed some dogs??? Really?
Sorry, I'll step off my soap box now.
This is the same NFL that let's gun waving, bar fighting, knife weilding, wife beating, girl rapers, crack smoking, drug dealing, DWI killers play every Sunday in every major city in the country - and you're worried about a guy that harmed some dogs??? Really?
And he once again will be another proud moment for the NFL, we have seen this all before.